Home / Fact sheets / Population fact sheet
The World Bank (2016)
World Health Organization (2015)
UNDP Human Development Report (2015)
The World Bank (2016)
GLOBOCAN (2018)
Country fact sheet: Czechia
| - Total population: | 10 566 332 |
| - Female population: | 5 373 556 |
| - Male population: | 5 192 776 |
Health Expenditure
| - Total per capita (US$): | 1 284.0 |
| - Out-of-pocket (% of total expenditure on health): | 14.8 |
Human Development Index
| - HDI: | 0.878 |
| - Category: | Very high |
Geography
 |
Life Expectancy at Birth
| - Total population (years): | 78.3 |
| - Female population (years): | 81.2 |
| - Male population (years): | 75.6 |
Cancer Burden
| - Overall cancer incidence (rate per 100 000 persons per year): | 296.7 |
| - Overall cancer mortality (rate per 100 000 persons per year): | 106.5 |
| - Most common cancer site by incidence for females (rate per 100 000 persons per year): | Breast (70.7) |
| - Most common cancer site by mortality for females (rate per 100 000 persons per year): | Lung (13.4) |
| - Most common cancer site by incidence for males (rate per 100 000 persons per year): | Prostate (88.0) |
| - Most common cancer site by mortality for males (rate per 100 000 persons per year): | Lung (30.8) |
| - GLOBOCAN 2018 population fact sheet |
BREAST CANCER SCREENING PROGRAMME
| Last updated year for qualitative data: | 2016 |
| Source of data: | Report (EU Report 2017) |
| Last updated year for quantitative data: | 2013 |
| Source of data: | Report (EU Report 2017) |
Screening protocol | |
| Year published/updated: |  |
| Screening test used: | 1 |
| Target age (min-max) and screening interval [months] for each test: | Mammography (45-70 years / [24 months] ) |
Programme status and organization | |
| Dedicated person/team to coordinate the programme: |  |
| Budget line for screening programme: | |
| Documented cancer screening policy: | |
| Nature of documentation of the policy: | Official recommendation |
| Program introduction was preceded by a pilot: | |
| Year program was initiated: | 2002 |
| Screening tests provided free of charge: | |
| Diagnostic tests provided free of charge: | |
| Treatment services provided free of charge: | |
Information system/Data collection | |
| Data type collected by the programme: | Individual |
| The information system collects data outside the program (opportunistic screening/private sector): | |
| Cancer screening registries covering the entire country/region: | |
| Cancer screening data is linked with Population-based cancer registry: | PBCR exists but not linked |
Invitation to screening and further assessment | |
| Method of identification of eligible individuals: | From population data |
| Source of population data: | List from insurance company |
| Annual target for screening coverage: | |
| Invitations to eligible population: | Excluding those covered by opportunistic screening |
| Method of invitation: | letter |
| Screen positive individuals actively invited for further assessment: | |
| Individuals with a precancer or cancer diagnosis actively contacted: | |
| Program collects data on the treatment of precancer/cancers: | |
Programme monitoring and quality assurance (QA) | |
| Documented standard operating procedure/policy for QA: | |
| Responsible person/team for QA: | |
| Documented performance indicators and their reference standards to assess the programme: | |
| Evaluation reports are prepared and published: | |
Cancer Screening programme status | |
| Nature of cancer screening programme: | Population-based |
| Current status of implementation (applicable only for population-based programmes): | Roll-out completed |
| Cancer screening programme population based for selected populations: | |
Performance indicators | |
| Target age and regional limitation if applicable: | 50-69 years |
| Invitation coverage (%): | |
| Examination coverage (%): | |
| Participation rate (%): | |
| Completeness of data related to screening results (%): | 100.0 |
| Completeness of data related to further assessment results (%): | |
| Further assessment rate (%): | 7.7 |
| Further assessment participation rate (%): | 100.0 |
| Detection rate of CIS and invasive (x 1000): | 5.24 |
| Detection rate of invasive cancer (x 1000): | 0.6 |
| Positive predictive value of further assessment to detect CIS and invasive (%): | 6.8 |
| Proportion of total carcinomas which are CIS (%): | 11.3 |
| Benign surgical biopsy rate (x 1000): | 0.27 |
| More quantitative data (2013) | |
CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING PROGRAMME
| Last updated year for qualitative data: | 2016 |
| Source of data: | Report (EU Report 2017) |
| Last updated year for quantitative data: | 2013 |
| Source of data: | Report (EU Report 2017) |
Screening protocol | |
| Year published/updated: | |
| Screening test used: | 1 |
| Target age (min-max) and screening interval [months] for each test: | Cytology (15- years / [12 months] ) |
| Triaging test used: | None |
| "screen and treat" included in the protocol: | |
Programme status and organization | |
| Dedicated person/team to coordinate the programme: | |
| Budget line for screening programme: | |
| Documented cancer screening policy: | |
| Nature of documentation of the policy: | Official recommendation |
| Program introduction was preceded by a pilot: | |
| Year program was initiated: | 2008 |
| Screening tests provided free of charge: | |
| Diagnostic tests provided free of charge: | |
| Treatment services provided free of charge: | |
Information system/Data collection | |
| Data type collected by the programme: | Individual |
| The information system collects data outside the program (opportunistic screening/private sector): | |
| Cancer screening registries covering the entire country/region: | |
| Cancer screening data is linked with population-based cancer registry: | PBCR exists but not linked |
Invitation to screening and further assessment | |
| Method of identification of eligible individuals: | From population data |
| Source of population data: | List from insurance company |
| Annual target for screening coverage: | |
| Invitations to eligible population: | Excluding those covered by opportunistic screening |
| Screening kit included with the invitation: |  |
| Method of invitation: | letter |
| Screen positive individuals actively invited for further assessment: | |
| Individuals with a precancer or cancer diagnosis actively contacted: | |
| Program collects data on the treatment of precancer/cancers: | |
Programme monitoring and quality assurance (QA) | |
| Documented standard operating procedure/policy for QA: | |
| Responsible person/team for QA: | |
| Documented performance indicators and their reference standards to assess the programme: | |
| Evaluation reports are prepared and published: | |
Cancer Screening programme status | |
| Nature of cancer screening programme: | Population-based |
| Current status of implementation: | Roll-out on going |
| Cancer screening programme population based for selected populations/regions: | |
Performance indicators | |
| Target age and regional limitation if applicable: | 30-59 years |
| Invitation coverage (%): | |
| Examination coverage (invitation cohort) (%): | |
| Examination coverage (tests in the index-year) (%): | 55.2 |
| Participation rate (%): | |
| Completeness of data related to screening test results (%): | 100 |
| Completeness of data related to further assessment results (%): | 30.7 |
| Colposcopy referral rate (%): | 1.2 |
| Colposcopy participation rate (%): | |
| Detection rate of CIN2+ (x 1000): | 2.03 |
| Detection rate of CIN3+ (x 1000): | 1.44 |
| Positive Predictive Value of abnormal screening test to detect CIN2+ (x 1000): | |
| Positive Predictive Value of CIN3+ (x 1000): | |
| More quantitative data (2013) | |
COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING PROGRAMME
| Last updated year for qualitative data: | 2013 |
| Source of data: | Report (EU Report 2017) |
| Last updated year for quantitative data: | 2013 |
| Source of data: | No source |
Screening protocol | |
| Year published/updated: | |
| Screening test used: | 2 |
| Target age (min-max) and screening interval [months] for each test: | FIT: (50- years / [24 months] ) Colonoscopy: (55- years / [120 months] ) |
Programme status and organization | |
| Dedicated person/team to coordinate the programme: | |
| Budget line for screening programme: | |
| Documented cancer screening policy: | |
| Nature of documentation of the policy: | Official recommendation |
| Program introduction was preceded by a pilot: | |
| Year program was initiated: | 2000 |
| Screening tests provided free of charge: | |
| Diagnostic tests provided free of charge: | |
| Treatment services provided free of charge: | |
Information system/Data collection | |
| Data type collected by the programme: | Individual |
| The information system collects data outside the program (opportunistic screening/private sector): | |
| Cancer screening registries covering the entire country/region: | |
| Cancer screening data is linked with population-based cancer registry: | PBCR exists but not linked |
Invitation to screening and further assessment | |
| Method of identification of eligible individuals: | From population data |
| Source of population data: | List from insurance company |
| Annual target for screening coverage: | |
| Invitations to eligible population: | Excluding those covered by opportunistic screening |
| Method of invitation: | letter |
| Screen positive individuals actively invited for further assessment: | |
| Individuals with a precancer or cancer diagnosis actively contacted: | |
| Program collects data on the treatment of precancer/cancers: | |
Programme monitoring and quality assurance (QA) | |
| Documented standard operating procedure/policy for QA: | |
| Responsible person/team for QA: | |
| Documented performance indicators and their reference standards to assess the programme: | |
| Evaluation reports are prepared and published: | |
Cancer Screening programme status | |
| Nature of cancer screening programme: | Population-based and non population-based |
| Current status of implementation (applicable only for population-based programmes): | Roll-out on going |
| Cancer screening programme population based for selected populations: | |
Performance indicators | |
| FIT | gFOBT | sigmoidoscopy | Colonoscopy | |
| Target age and regional limitation if applicable: | 50-74 | 50-74 | ||
| Invitation coverage (%): | ||||
| Examination coverage (%): | 31.4 | 1.7 | ||
| Participation rate (%): | ||||
| Completeness of data related to screening results (%): | 100.0 | |||
| Completeness of data related to information about attendance to colonoscopy assessment (%): | 100.0 | |||
| Completeness of data related to histology result (%): | 100.0 | |||
| Screen positivity (indication for follow-up colonoscopy) rate (%) : | 7.4 | 4.1 | ||
| Follow-up colonoscopy participation rate (%): | 52.8 | 80.2 | ||
| Completion rate follow-up colonoscopy (%): | 96.4 | 96.4 | ||
| Detection rate of adenomas (x 1000): | 15.3 | 6.9 | ||
| Detection rate of advanced adenomas (x 1000): | 7.1 | |||
| Detection rate of colorectal cancers (x 1000): | 1.1 | 1.0 | ||
| Positive Predictive Value of further assessment to detect adenomas (%): | 39.0 | 20.9 | ||
| Positive Predictive Value of further assessment to detect advanced adenomas (%): | 18.2 | |||
| Positive Predictive Value of further assessment to detect colorectal cancers (%): | 3.0 | 3.1 | ||
| More quantitative data for FIT (Male - 2013) | ||||
| More quantitative data for FIT (Women - 2013) | ||||
| More quantitative data for Colonoscopy (Male - 2013) | ||||
| More quantitative data for Colonoscopy (Women - 2013) |